Schmidt v. Navistar, Inc.
| D. Maria Schmidt |
| Navistar, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv00321 |
| April 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Albuquerque Office |
| Santa Fe |
| Kenneth J. Gonzales |
| Karen B. Molzen |
| Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
139
ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales adopting 138 Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition; and granting 134 Joint Motion for Court Approval of Settlement on Behalf of the Minor Plaintiff Beneficiary of the Estate. (tah)
|
|
Filing
138
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT BENEFITTING A MINOR by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar re 134 Joint Motion for Court Approval of Settlement on Behalf of the Minor Plaintiff Beneficiary of the Estate. Objections to PF RD due by 4/26/2021. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (kc)
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales referring to Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar 134 Joint Motion to Approve Settlement on Behalf of The Minor Plaintiff Beneficiary of The Estate. (tah)
|
|
Filing
117
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar Regarding Defendant's Objection and Request to Stay. (kc)
|
|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales granting 93 Defendant Navistar, Inc.'s Objection and Request to Stay Order; and denying 102 Defendant's request for a non-evidentiary hearing. (tah)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER LIFTING STAY by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales. (tah)
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales granting 26 Motion to Certify an Interlocutory Appeal. This case is stayed pending the outcome of that appeal. (tah)
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales denying 3 Defendant's Amended Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (tah)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales granting 16 Unopposed Motion to Exceed Page Limitations. (tah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schmidt v. Navistar, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Navistar, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey M. Croasdell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: D. Maria Schmidt | |
| Represented By: | Rosalind Bienvenu |
| Represented By: | Andrew G Counts |
| Represented By: | Justin Ross Kaufman |
| Represented By: | Wendell P Martens, Jr |
| Represented By: | E Todd Tracy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
