Flores et al v. City of Farmington et al
Plaintiff: Reyes Flores and Pat Flores
Defendant: City of Farmington, Farmington Police Department, The, Steven Hebbe, Nick Bloomfield, Matthew Veith, Tom Swenk and Taft Tracy
Case Number: 1:2018cv00402
Filed: April 30, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Office: Albuquerque Office
County: San Juan
Presiding Judge: Laura Fashing
Presiding Judge: Karen B. Molzen
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 155 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. Defendant City of Farmington's 148 Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Memorandum in Support is DENIED. (ve)
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 136 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. The Defendants' 107 Motion for Summary Judgment against Reyes Flores is GRANTED. (ve)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 135 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. The 88 Defendants' Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings against Pat Flores for Failure to State a Claim and Memorandum in Support Thereof is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART for the reasons set for in this Memorandum Opinion and Order. The 108 Defendants' Motion and Memorandum in Support for Summary Judgment against Plaintiff, Pat Flores ("Pat") is GRANTED. (ve)
January 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 133 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. The 89 Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings against Reyes Flores for Failure to State a Claim and Memorandum in Support Thereof is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART pursuant to the findings set forth in this Memorandum Opinion and Order. (ve)
January 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER FOR CLARIFICATION FROM PLAINTIFF PAT FLORES by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. Plaintiff, Pat Flores is hereby ordered to file a notice clarifying whether he asserts any Title VII claims under Counts V, VI, and VII within seven (7) days of the entry of this order. (ve)
October 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 60 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson GRANTING IN PART 48 Defendants Steven Hebbe, Nick Bloomfield, Matthew Veith, Tom Swenk, Taft Tracy and City of Farmington's Motion for Partial Dismissal of the First Amended Complaint for Failure to state a Claim, Based on Qualified Immunity. (mag)
February 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson granting in part and denying in part 20 Opposed MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND BASED ON QUALIFIED IMMUNITY (meq)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flores et al v. City of Farmington et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Reyes Flores
Represented By: Michael E. Mozes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pat Flores
Represented By: Michael E. Mozes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Farmington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Farmington Police Department, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Hebbe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nick Bloomfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Veith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tom Swenk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Taft Tracy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?