Sutton v. Heartland Payment Systems, LLC et al
Tonya Sutton |
Joseph Wayne Rigsby and Heartland Payment Systems, LLC |
1:2018cv00723 |
July 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Albuquerque Office |
Bernalillo |
Kirtan Khalsa |
Jerry H Ritter |
Martha Vazquez |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Joseph Wayne Rigsby, Sr. by Tonya Sutton. (Curtis, Stephen) |
|
|
Filing 13 Clerk's Minutes for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa: Telephone Scheduling Conference held on 9/21/2018. (kc) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Tonya Sutton (Curtis, Stephen) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Heartland Payment Systems, LLC re Initial Disclosures (Thomas, Krystle) |
Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (Curtis, Stephen) |
Filing 9 Joint Status Report by Heartland Payment Systems, LLC (Thomas, Krystle) |
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Amended Complaint served on Joseph Wayne Rigsby, Sr. on August 21, 2018, filed by Tonya Sutton. (Curtis, Stephen) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tonya Sutton. (Curtis, Stephen) |
Filing 6 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to District Judge Martha Vazquez as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (mnb) |
Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Heartland Payment Systems, LLC (Thomas, Krystle) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Heartland Payment Systems, LLC. (Thomas, Krystle) |
|
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (ln) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Heartland Payment Systems, LLC from Second Judicial District Court, case number D-202-CV-2018-03663. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Heartland Payment Systems, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Thomas, Krystle) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-5942120 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Heartland Payment Systems, LLC (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Thomas, Krystle) |
United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter and United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.