Crespin v. Jablonski et al
Adam Crespin |
David Jablonski, German Franco and Wendy Perez |
1:2018cv00946 |
October 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Kenneth J Gonzales |
Kevin R Sweazea |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Amended ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) , filed by David Jablonski. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Ganz, Paula) |
Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales. (tah) |
Filing 5 Filing fee: Paid Online $ 400.00, receipt number 1084-6075314 (bap)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 4 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) , filed by David Jablonski. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1) (Ganz, Paula) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by David Jablonski Defendants' Demand for Service (Ganz, Paula) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Paula E. Ganz on behalf of All Defendants (Ganz, Paula) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from First Judicial District Court, case number D-101-CV-2018-02543. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Ganz, Paula) |
District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales and Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea assigned. (kdh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.