Kohutek et al v. Burns et al
| Lori Kohutek and Michael Kohutek |
| Destiny Real Estate and Development, LLC, Dianna Gandy and Rhonda Burns |
| 2:2018cv01076 |
| November 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kevin R Sweazea |
| Stephan M Vidmar |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 13 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge filed by Dianna Gandy, 3 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge filed by Lori Kohutek & Michael Kohutek, 11 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge filed by Rhonda Burns, 12 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge filed by Destiny Real Estate and Development, LLC. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (rh) |
Filing 14
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. Telephonic Rule 16(c) Hearing set for February 6, 2019 at 10:00 AM. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than February 4, 2019. (cbf)
|
| Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Dianna Gandy voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Borner, Cord)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Destiny Real Estate and Development, LLC voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Borner, Cord)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Rhonda Burns voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Borner, Cord)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 10 Defendants ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM for Attorney's Fees against All Defendants by Destiny Real Estate and Development, LLC.(Borner, Cord) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint by Dianna Gandy.(Crutchfield, Carl) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lori Kohutek, Michael Kohutek. Dianna Gandy served on 12/3/2018, answer due 12/24/2018. (Umarov, Arslanbek) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants., filed by Lori Kohutek, Michael Kohutek. (Umarov, Arslanbek) |
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. Plaintiffs are granted leave to amend #1 their Complaint no later than December 17, 2018. (am)
|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Lori Kohutek, Michael Kohutek as to Rhonda Burns, Destiny Real Estate and Development, LLC. (Umarov, Arslanbek) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Arslanbek S. Umarov on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Umarov, Arslanbek) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Lori Kohutek, Michael Kohutek voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Umarov, Arslanbek)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
| Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (jg) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar and United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea assigned. (jg) |
| Summons Issued as to Rhonda Burns, Destiny Real Estate and Development, LLC, Dianna Gandy. (jg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Breach of Contract against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Lori Kohutek, Michael Kohutek. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Umarov, Arslanbek) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6139729 re #1 Complaint filed by Lori Kohutek, Michael Kohutek (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Umarov, Arslanbek) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
