Martinez et al v. Draim et al
| JAM2, Gary Martinez, Michelle Samantha Martinez, JAM3 and JAM1 |
| Kenneth Draim and Sara Draim |
| 1:2018cv01098 |
| November 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Laura Fashing |
| Karen B Molzen |
| James A Parker |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 Letter remanding case to Taos County - Eighth Judicial District Court, State of New Mexico. (The original case file and a certified copy of this docket sheet have been sent via USPS). (kg) |
Filing 18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF REMAND by District Judge James A. Parker GRANTING in part and DENYING in part #8 MOTION to Remand . The case is hereby remanded to the Eighth Judicial District Court, County of Taos, State of New Mexico. Plaintiffs' request for attorney costs and fees, however, is denied. (kg)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: No. 12. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bl) |
| Filing 16 Transmittal of State Court Documents by Kenneth Draim, Sara Draim (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Wesenberg, Natasha) |
| Filing 15 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to District Judge James A. Parker as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (kdh) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Briefing Complete by Gary Martinez re #8 MOTION to Remand filed by Gary Martinez (Cravens, Richard) |
| Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION to Remand filed by Gary Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Cravens, Richard) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Remand filed by Kenneth Draim, Sara Draim. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Wesenberg, Natasha) |
| Filing 10 Filing fee Received Online: $ 400.00, receipt number 1084-6155885 (bap)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen VACATING the Initial Scheduling Conference set for 01/17/2019 and all corresponding deadlines. The Court finds good cause to extend the time to issue the scheduling order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). The Court will reset the Initial Scheduling Conference pending resolution of #8 Motion to Remand. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 12/18/2018. [THIS IS A TEXT ONLY ENTRY- NO DOCUMENTS ARE ATTACHED.] (cm)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Remand by Gary Martinez. (Cravens, Richard) |
|
Filing 7
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen setting a Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference for 01/17/2019 at 02:30 PM in Albuquerque - Telephonic Hearing/Conference before Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen. Joint Status Report due by 01/10/2019. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 12/18/2018. (cm)
|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Kenneth Draim, Sara Draim (Wesenberg, Natasha) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Natasha A. Wesenberg on behalf of Kenneth Draim, Sara Draim (Wesenberg, Natasha) |
| Filing 4 Defendants Kenneth Draim and Sara Draim's ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Kenneth Draim, Sara Draim. (Wesenberg, Natasha) |
| Filing 3 ERRATA by Kenneth Draim, Sara Draim (Wesenberg, Natasha) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by KENNETH DRAIM, SARA DRAIM from Eighth Judicial District Court, Taos County, case number D-820-CV-2018-00351. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by KENNETH DRAIM, SARA DRAIM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Wesenberg, Natasha) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing and United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen assigned. (jg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
