Armendariz v. Moya et al
| Michael Armendariz |
| Attorney General State of New Mexico, Stanley Moya, State of New Mexico and John Gay |
| 1:2018cv01144 |
| December 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| William P Johnson |
| Steven C Yarbrough |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER TO ANSWER by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough. (kc)
|
| Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number ALB042063 re #1 PETITION Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Armendariz. (mnb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/7/2018: # 1 Case Number Included) (mnb). filed by Michael Armendariz (ln)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 5 APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT re #1 Petition for 2254 Relief by Michael Armendariz (meq) |
| Filing 4 Letter by Michael Armendariz (meq) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Michael Armendariz. (mnb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Armendariz. (mnb) |
| Filing 1 PETITION Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Armendariz. (mnb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/7/2018: #1 Case Number Included) (mnb). |
| Chief District Judge William P. Johnson and Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (mnb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
