Chavez v. United States Army et al
| Ramie Chavez |
| Anthony S Leal, New Mexico National Guard Agency, Elizabeth A Bryant, Jason Saavedra, United States Army, Nathanial L Carper, Steve Garcia, Mary F Laumbach, Warren Maestas, Susana Martinez, Mark R Vigil, Daniel A Williams, Brian White, Jerry H Garcia, Michelle Lujan Grisham, Scott C Weever and Kenneth A. Nava |
| 1:2018cv01145 |
| December 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Laura Fashing |
| Steven C Yarbrough |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE by United States Army of Entry of Order Lifting Stay (Attachments: #1 Order) (Jeu, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by United States Army of Notice of Entry of Administrative Order Staying Case (Attachments: #1 Order) (Hoses, Michael) |
| Filing 6 On December 27, 2018, the Chief Judge of this district filed a "Temporary Administrative Order Relating to Civil Cases Involving the United States." See In Re Civil Proceedings Involving the United States During Federal Lapse in Appropriations, 18-MC-00004-55 and 18-MC-00035-02 (D.N.M.). This order imposed a temporary stay in "all civil cases within the District of New Mexico wherein the United States or an agency, corporation, officer or employee, deemed or otherwise, of the United States is a party[.]" Id. 3. The order also extended all deadlines in affected cases "for a period of time commensurate with the duration of the lapse in appropriations, but in no case beyond January 16, 2019, absent further Order of the Court." Id. Consequently, because this civil case involves as a party the United States or an agency thereof, this case is TEMPORARILY STAYED pending further order of this Court. All current deadlines will be EXTENDED by the number of days that elapse between today's date and the lifting of the temporary stay. So ordered. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (hm) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by United States Army of Related Cases (Jeu, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (mnb) |
| Filing 3 APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint by Ramie Chavez (Attachments: #1 Supplemental Attachment 1, #2 Supplemental Attachment 2) (mnb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ramie Chavez. (mnb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Ramie Chavez. (mnb) |
| Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing and Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (mnb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
