Dendy v. Diversified Consultants, Inc., et al.
Plaintiff: Chris Dendy
Defendant: Jane Does and Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv01177
Filed: December 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: James O Browning
Referring Judge: Laura Fashing
2 Judge: Kirtan Khalsa
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: No. 7. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bl)
January 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER TO VACATE by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. The telephonic Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference set for 2/14/2019 at 02:00 PM in Albuquerque is VACATED along with all associated deadlines. The initial scheduling conference will be reset at a later date. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. NO DOCUMENTS ARE ATTACHED.](cda)
January 22, 2019 Filing 10 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to United States District Judge James O. Browning as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg)
January 11, 2019 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Chris Dendy (Initial Disclosure) (Childress, Sidney)
January 11, 2019 Filing 8 ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint by Diversified Consultants, Inc..(Farrow, John)
December 31, 2018 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants., filed by Chris Dendy. (Childress, Sidney)
December 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing setting a telephonic Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference for 2/14/2019 at 02:00 PM in Albuquerque - Telephonic Hearing/Conference before Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan due by 2/7/2019. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 1/18/2019. (pv)
December 19, 2018 Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6190353 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Diversified Consultants, Inc. (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Farrow, John)
December 17, 2018 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Diversified Consultants, Inc. (Farrow, John)
December 14, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE by Diversified Consultants, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet (Farrow, John)
December 14, 2018 Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (ln)
December 14, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Diversified Consultants, Inc. from Thirteenth Judicial District Court, case number D-1329-CV-2018-02344. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Diversified Consultants, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Farrow, John)
December 14, 2018 United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa and United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (ln)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dendy v. Diversified Consultants, Inc., et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chris Dendy
Represented By: Sidney Childress
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Represented By: John E. Farrow
Represented By: Nathan H. Mann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?