Hudson v. Acadia Healthcare Company Inc. et al
| Jennifer Whitney Hudson |
| Anthony Padilla, Carla Tankersley, Brenda Perry, Acadia Healthcare Company Inc., Eliot Kerner, Robert Grady, Desert Hills, Inc., Eryn Patchett and Brock Wolfe |
| 1:2019cv00022 |
| January 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| William P Johnson |
| Steven C Yarbrough |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson in favor of Defendants. (mag) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson DISMISSING #1 Complaint without prejudice. (mag) |
| United States Chief District Judge William P. Johnson assigned. (jg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Pro Se Plaintiff Jennifer Whitney Hudson electing to receive notice via e-mail. (kdh) |
| Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough has been assigned for a 28 U.S.C. 1915 review. (kdh)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 2 **FILED IN ERROR (incomplete document)** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jennifer Whitney Hudson. (kdh) Modified docket text on 1/10/2019 (kdh). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jennifer Whitney Hudson. (kdh) |
| Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (kdh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
