Janan v. Trump et al
Anne Janan |
The U.S. Electoral College and Donald Trump |
1:2019cv00049 |
January 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Kirtan Khalsa |
Karen B Molzen |
Martha Vazquez |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 FINAL JUDGMENT by District Judge Martha Vazquez. IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (gr) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez DENYING #7 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint; DENYING AS MOOT #10 MOTION to Dismiss; and DENYING AS MOOT #9 MOTION to Dismiss. See Order for Specifics. (gr) |
Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed The U.S. Electoral College served on 1/30/2019, answer due 2/20/2019. (gr) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF ABSENCE by Anne Janan from February 25 through April 25. (gr) |
Filing 13 Letter by Anne Janan. (gr) |
Filing 12 Letter by Anne Janan requesting the court to lodge a disk containing "Order One" and "Order Two". |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed Donald Trump served on 1/28/2019, answer due 2/19/2019. (jg) |
Filing 10 SECOND MOTION to Dismiss by Anne Janan. (jg) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Anne Janan. (gr) |
Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen by District Judge Martha Vazquez. (gr) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by Anne Janan. (ln) |
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Plaintiff's Spouse, Gary Henderson. (mnb) |
Filing 5 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to United States District Judge Martha Vazquez as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
Filing 4 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
Filing 3 CM/ECF Pro Se Notification Form by Anne Janan (jg) |
Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number ALB042439 (mnb)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] Modified Document # on 1/18/2019 (jg). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The U.S. Electoral College, Donald Trump, filed by Anne Janan. (jg) (Main Document 1 replaced on 1/18/2019) (jg). |
Summons Issued as to The U.S. Electoral College, Donald Trump. (jg) |
United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa and United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen assigned. (jg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.