Estes v. Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico
| Linda Estes |
| Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico as Trustees for the University of New Mexico Hospital and Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico |
| 1:2019cv00417 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kevin R Sweazea |
| Steven C Yarbrough |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendants filed by Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico. (Esquibel, Diego) |
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico Initial Disclosures (Esquibel, Diego) |
Filing 14
Order by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough setting a Telephonic Status Conference for 08/15/2019 at 10:00 a.m. The purpose of this conference is to discuss setting a settlement conference. The parties shall call the AT&T Conference line at (888) 808-6929 [Access Code: 8865421] to connect to the proceedings. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (cm)
|
|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough. Discovery due by 12/20/2019. Discovery Motions due by 01/10/2020. Pretrial Motions due by 01/24/2020. (cm)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER ADOPTING JOINT STATUS REPORT by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough. (cm)
|
| Filing 11 Clerk's Minutes for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough: Scheduling Conference held on 06/27/2019. (cm) |
| Filing 10 DEFENDANT'S ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES by Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico. (Esquibel, Diego) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Linda Estes Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures (Jacobus, Harry) |
| Filing 8 STATUS REPORT AND PROVISIONAL DISCOVERY PLAN by Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico (Esquibel, Diego) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendants by Linda Estes. (Jacobus, Harry) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 4 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge filed by Linda Estes & 5 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge filed by Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (kls) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Esquibel, Diego)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 4 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Linda Estes voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Jacobus, Harry)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
|
Filing 3
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 06/27/2019 at 01:30 PM in Albuquerque. The parties are to call Judge Yarbrough's AT&T Teleconference Line at 888-808-6929, Access Code 8865421, to connect to the proceedings. Joint Status Report due by 06/17/2019. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 5/31/2019. (cm)
|
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (mnb) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6420721 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico as Trustees for the University of New Mexico Hospital (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Esquibel, Diego) |
| Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea and Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (mnb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico as Trustees for the University of New Mexico Hospital from Second Judicial District Court State of New Mexico, case number D-202-CV-2018-08325. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico as Trustees for the University of New Mexico Hospital. (Esquibel, Diego) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
