Mingo v. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Stacy Lynn Mingo
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2019cv00440
Filed: May 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Stephan M Vidmar
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stacy Lynn Mingo. Social Security Administration served on 6/27/2019, answer due 8/26/2019. (Martone, Feliz)
June 28, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stacy Lynn Mingo. Social Security Administration served on 6/13/2019, answer due 8/16/2019. (Martone, Feliz)
June 28, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stacy Lynn Mingo. Social Security Administration served on 6/17/2019, answer due 8/16/2019. (Martone, Feliz)
June 27, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Kirsten Westerland on behalf of Social Security Administration (Westerland, Kirsten)
June 6, 2019 Filing 3 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Stacy Lynn Mingo voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Martone, Feliz)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
June 6, 2019 Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (khs)
May 14, 2019 Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (mnb)
May 14, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Stacy Lynn Mingo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martone, Feliz)
May 14, 2019 Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6429341 re #1 Complaint filed by Stacy Lynn Mingo (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Martone, Feliz)
May 14, 2019 Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar assigned. (mnb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mingo v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacy Lynn Mingo
Represented By: Feliz MariSol Martone
Represented By: Gary J Martone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Manuel Lucero
Represented By: Kirsten Westerland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?