Gattis v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc.
| Keith Gattis |
| Real Time Resolutions, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00444 |
| May 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Steven C Yarbrough |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Real Time Resolutions, Inc. answer due 7/5/2019. (jg) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Keith Gattis NOTICE re: extending deadline to respond to Complaint (Mattison, Nicholas) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Keith Gattis NOTICE (Mattison, Nicholas) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Keith Gattis voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Mattison, Nicholas)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Keith Gattis. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. served on 5/17/2019, answer due 6/7/2019. (Mattison, Nicholas) |
| Summons Issued as to Real Time Resolutions, Inc.. (mnb) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6430897 re #1 Complaint filed by Keith Gattis (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Mattison, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (ln) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by KEITH GATTIS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet 1-1)(Mattison, Nicholas) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa and United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gattis v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Keith Gattis | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas H. Mattison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Real Time Resolutions, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
