Summers v. Department of Corrections et al
| Leslie Summers |
| Department of Corrections, State of New Mexico and FNU Bowen |
| 1:2019cv00476 |
| May 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Judith C Herrera |
| Karen B Molzen |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filing fee: $ 6.76, receipt number ALB044155 (ar)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 7 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Leslie Summers (mjr) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Leslie Summers. (mjr) |
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen granting #2 and #4 Motions to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915. (KBM)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Leslie Summers. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Leslie Summers. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (mjr) Modified docket text on 6/19/2019 (ln). |
|
Filing 3
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen to Cure Defects by 6/24/2019. (KBM)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Leslie Summers. (ln) |
| Filing 1 1983 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Leslie Summers. (ln) |
| United States District Judge Judith C. Herrera and United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen assigned. (ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
