Upton v. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Robert Upton
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2019cv00482
Filed: May 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Carmen E Garza
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Chad Troop on behalf of Social Security Administration (Troop, Chad)
July 3, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert Upton. Social Security Administration (Diane Tapia, Civil Process Clerk) served on 6/20/2019, answer due 8/19/2019. (bc)
June 24, 2019 Filing 8 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Social Security Administration voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Lucero, Manuel)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
June 24, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Manuel Lucero on behalf of Social Security Administration (Lucero, Manuel)
June 20, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert Upton. Social Security Administrative Office served on 6/19/2019, answer due 8/19/2019. (vh)
June 20, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert Upton. William Barr, USDOJ served on 6/19/2019, answer due 8/19/2019. (vh)
June 5, 2019 Summons Issued as to Robert Upton, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (khs)
May 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and directing service by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. (ag)
May 24, 2019 Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg)
May 24, 2019 United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza assigned. (jg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Upton v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Upton
Represented By: Benjamin Eilers Decker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Manuel Lucero
Represented By: Chad Troop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?