Pruess v. Presbyterian Health Plan, Inc.
| Dania Pruess |
| Presbyterian Health Plan, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00629 |
| July 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Laura Fashing |
| John F Robbenhaar |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Presbyterian Health Plan, Inc. answer due 9/27/2019. THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED. (kc)
|
|
Filing 5
Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Presbyterian Health Plan, Inc.. (Lynn, Douglas)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Douglas Lynn on behalf of Presbyterian Health Plan, Inc. (Lynn, Douglas)
|
|
Summons Issued as to Presbyterian Health Plan, Inc. (ln)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE by Dania Pruess Filing Additional Consents (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Linda Young Consent, #2 Exhibit B - Mary Bateman Consent, #3 Exhibit C - Sarah Mullikin Consent, #4 Exhibit D - Teresa Harris Consent) (Hedgpeth, Travis)
|
|
Filing 2
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg)
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing and United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar assigned. (jg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Presbyterian Health Plan, Inc. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Dania Pruess. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Dania Pruess Consent Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hedgpeth, Travis)
|
|
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6537681 re #1 Complaint filed by Dania Pruess (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Hedgpeth, Travis)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pruess v. Presbyterian Health Plan, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dania Pruess | |
| Represented By: | Travis Hedgpeth |
| Represented By: | Jack L. Siegel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Presbyterian Health Plan, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Douglas Lynn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
