Alderete v. Social Security Administration
| Yolanda Alderete |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2019cv00643 |
| July 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Arlen Thomas on behalf of Social Security Administration (Thomas, Michael) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Manuel Lucero on behalf of Social Security Administration (Lucero, Manuel) |
| Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (ln) |
Filing 6
Order for Service of Process by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. (tkl)
|
|
Filing 5
Order Granting Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. (tkl)
|
| Filing 4 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Yolanda Alderete voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Armstrong, Michael)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (ln) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Yolanda Alderete. (Armstrong, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security ( Filing Fee - Waived), filed by Yolanda Alderete. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Armstrong, Michael) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Alderete v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Manuel Lucero |
| Represented By: | Michael Arlen Thomas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Yolanda Alderete | |
| Represented By: | Michael D. Armstrong |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
