Jenkins v. City of Las Vegas et al
Plaintiff: Kenneth Jenkins
Defendant: Yet-To-Be-Identified Individuals and City of Las Vegas
Case Number: 1:2019cv00656
Filed: July 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Laura Fashing
Referring Judge: Jerry H Ritter
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2019 Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg)
July 18, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Complaint for Race/National Original Discrimination and Retaliation in Violation of the United States Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New Mexico Human Rights Act; Violations of the New Mexico Whistleblower Protection Act; Violations of 42 U.s.c., Sections 1981a and 1983; Bad Faith Breach of Employment Contract; Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; Intentional Interference with Employment Contract; Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; Negligent Training and Supervision; and Civil Conspiracy against City of Las Vegas, Yet-To-Be-Identified Individuals and/or Entities ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Kenneth Jenkins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bennett, Merit)
July 18, 2019 Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6550584 re #1 Complaint,, filed by Kenneth Jenkins (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Bennett, Merit)
July 18, 2019 United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing and United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (jg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jenkins v. City of Las Vegas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Jenkins
Represented By: Merit Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yet-To-Be-Identified Individuals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Las Vegas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?