Kucera v. Department of Justice et al
| Gregory E. Kucera |
| Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security |
| 1:2019cv00931 |
| October 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| John F Robbenhaar |
| Martha Vazquez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Email by Gregory Kucera (cmm) |
| Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT by District Judge Martha Vazquez. (gr) |
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING #1 Complaint by District Judge Martha Vazquez. IT IS ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice. (gr)
|
| United States District Judge Martha Vazquez assigned. (arp) |
| United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar assigned. (arp) |
| Filing 4 CM/ECF Pro Se Notification Form by Gregory E. Kucera electing to receive notification via e-mail. (arp) |
| Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar has been assigned for a 28 U.S.C. 1915 review. (arp)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Gregory E. Kucera. (arp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, filed by Gregory E. Kucera. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(arp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
