Tena v. Hewlett-Packard Company
| Marybell M. Tena |
| Hewlett-Packard Company |
| 1:2019cv00954 |
| October 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Judith C Herrera |
| Jerry H Ritter |
| Stephan M Vidmar |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter. Discovery due by 6/1/2020. Pretrial Motions due by 7/8/2020. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 9/18/2020. (mlt)
|
| Filing 10 Clerk's Minutes for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter: Telephonic Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference held on 12/4/2019. (mlt) |
| Filing 9 Joint Status Report by Hewlett-Packard Company (Robeda, Andrea) |
| Filing 8 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to District Judge Judith C. Herrera as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (ln) |
| Filing 7 Transmittal of State Court Documents by Hewlett-Packard Company (Robeda, Andrea) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that this matter will be reassigned to a district judge as presiding judge if written consents from all parties have not been filed by November 14, 2019. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (rh) |
|
Filing 5
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter setting a Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference for 12/4/2019 at 02:30 PM in Albuquerque - Telephonic Hearing/Conference before Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter. Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan due by 11/27/2019. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 11/14/2019. (mlt)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Hewlett-Packard Company. (Robeda, Andrea) |
| Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HEWLETT-PACKARD, CO., (Robeda, Andrea) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by HEWLETT-PACKARD, CO., from Second Judicial District Court, case number D-202-2019-06876. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by HEWLETT-PACKARD, CO.,. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-F)(Robeda, Andrea) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6729629 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by HEWLETT-PACKARD, CO., (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Robeda, Andrea) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar and United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (dr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tena v. Hewlett-Packard Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company | |
| Represented By: | Danny W. Jarrett |
| Represented By: | Andrea K. Robeda |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marybell M. Tena | |
| Represented By: | Narciso Garcia, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
