T.G. v. Board of County Commissioners of County of Rio Arriba et al
| T.G. |
| Leon Gallegos, James Lujan and Board of County Commissioners of County of Rio Arriba |
| 1:2019cv01116 |
| December 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Jerry H Ritter |
| John F Robbenhaar |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Board of County Commissioners of County of Rio Arriba, James Lujan (Defendant Board of County Commissioners for the County of Rio Arriba and Sheriff Lujan's Initial Disclosures) (Delgadillo, Gabriela) |
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by T.G. Plaintiff's Rule 26 Initial Disclosure Statement (Kennedy, Shannon) |
| Filing 14 Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan by Leon Gallegos (Becker, Robert) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE by Leon Gallegos (Initial Disclosures) (Becker, Robert) |
| Filing 12 Transmittal of State Court Documents by Board of County Commissioners of County of Rio Arriba, Leon Gallegos, James Lujan (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Becker, Robert) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 3 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Leon Gallegos, 5 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by T.G., 9 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by James Lujan, Board of County Commissioners of County of Rio Arriba. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (aek) |
Filing 10
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter setting a Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference for February 5, 2020 at 2:30 PM in Albuquerque - Telephonic Hearing/Conference before Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter. Counsel shall call the toll-free AT&T conference line at (888) 278-0296, enter access code 9998216, and press # to be joined to the proceedings. Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan due by January 29, 2020. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than January 16, 2020. (plp)
|
| Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Board of County Commissioners of County of Rio Arriba, James Lujan voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Sullivan, James)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 8 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Board of County Commissioners of County of Rio Arriba, James Lujan (Sullivan, James) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Board of County Commissioners of County of Rio Arriba, James Lujan. (Sullivan, James) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Board of County Commissioners of County of Rio Arriba, James Lujan (Notice of Agreed Upon Extension to Answer) (Sullivan, James) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), T.G. voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Kennedy, Shannon)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Leon Gallegos. (Becker, Robert) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Leon Gallegos voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Becker, Robert)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (arp) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Leon Gallegos from First Judicial District Court, case number D-117-CV-2019-00514. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Leon Gallegos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Errata C)(Becker, Robert) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6827486 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Leon Gallegos (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Becker, Robert) |
| United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar and United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (arp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
