Chavez v. Horton et al
| Mario Chavez |
| Attorney General of the State of New Mexico and Vincent Horton |
| 1:2019cv01151 |
| December 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Laura Fashing |
| Kea W Riggs |
| Martha Vazquez |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Mario Chavez. (cmm)
|
|
Filing 4
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to District Judge Kea W. Riggs as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. District Judge Martha Vazquez no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg*)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Change of Address by Mario Chavez (mjr)
|
|
Filing 2
Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number ALB045433 (jg)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Mario Chavez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(jg)
|
|
United States District Judge Martha Vazquez and United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (jg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
