Frye v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Debby Frye
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 1:2019cv01198
Filed: December 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Laura Fashing
Referring Judge: Kirtan Khalsa
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2674
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2020 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Debby Frye. United States of America served on 1/15/2020, answer due 3/16/2020. (Lewis, Veronica)
January 20, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Debby Frye. Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice served on 1/13/2020, answer due 3/13/2020. (Lewis, Veronica) Modified docket text on 1/21/2020 (ln).
January 20, 2020 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Debby Frye. Attorney General served on 1/13/2020, answer due 3/13/2020. (Lewis, Veronica) Modified on 1/21/2020 (ln).
January 20, 2020 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Debby Frye. U.S. Attorney served on 1/7/2020, answer due 3/9/2020. (Lewis, Veronica) Modified on 1/21/2020 (ln).
December 26, 2019 Summons Issued as to United States of America, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General, and Department of the Navy. (dr)
December 20, 2019 Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (aek)
December 20, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PERSONAL INJURY PURSUANT TO FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT against United States of America ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Debby Frye. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Tort Claims Confirmation)(Harvey, Holly)
December 20, 2019 Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6867591 re #1 Complaint, filed by Debby Frye (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Harvey, Holly)
December 20, 2019 United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa and United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (aek)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frye v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Debby Frye
Represented By: Veronica N. Lewis
Represented By: Audra Davie
Represented By: Holly R Harvey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?