M.C. v. Kassem
M C and M.C. |
Khaled Kassem |
1:2019cv01215 |
December 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Jerry H Ritter |
Steven C Yarbrough |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter setting a Telephonic Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference for April 8, 2020 at 2:30 PM. Counsel shall call the toll-free AT&T conference line at (888) 278-0296, enter access code 9998216, and press # to be joined to the proceedings. The Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan is due by April 1, 2020. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than March 26, 2020. (plp) |
Filing 8 Defendant Khaled Kassem's ANSWER to #1 Complaint for Civil Rights Violations by Khaled Kassem. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by M.C..(Narvaez, Henry) |
Filing 7 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), M.C. voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Hart, F)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Henry F. Narvaez on behalf of Khaled Kassem (Narvaez, Henry) |
Filing 5 Summons Returned Executed with Complaint for Civil Rights Violations served on Defendant Khaled Kassem on 01/06/2020, filed by M.C.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Signed USPS Delivery Confirmation Card)(Stout Sanchez, Kelly) Modified docket text to read correct event on 1/15/2020 (aek). |
Filing 4 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (aek) |
Summons Issued as to Khaled Kassem. (aek) |
United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough and United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (aek) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by F Michael Hart on behalf of M C (Hart, F) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kelly A. Stout Sanchez on behalf of M C (Stout Sanchez, Kelly) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Civil Rights Violations against Khaled Kassem ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by M C. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Romero, Julio) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6874567 re #1 Complaint filed by M C (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Romero, Julio) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.