Shultz v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
| Ashley Shultz |
| United Parcel Service, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00073 |
| January 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Gregory B Wormuth |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER AND FINDING GOOD CAUSE TO DELAY SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. Defendant is allowed up to and including March 27, 2020 to file its Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. The Court will set a Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference after Defendant has answered or otherwise responded to the Complaint. (kys)
|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION to Extend Defendant's Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint by United Parcel Service, Inc. (Barton, David) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by David T. Barton on behalf of All Defendants (Barton, David) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (ln) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United Parcel Service, Inc. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Ashley Shultz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EEOC Right to Sue, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Joeckel, David) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6918653 re #1 Complaint filed by Ashley Shultz (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Joeckel, David) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth and United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (ln) |
| Summons Issued as to United Parcel Service, Inc. (aek) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shultz v. United Parcel Service, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ashley Shultz | |
| Represented By: | David B. Joeckel, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
