Verdream v. USA
Petitioner: James Verdream
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 1:2020cv00481
Filed: May 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Office: Albuquerque Office
Presiding Judge: Carmen E Garza
Referring Judge: William P Johnson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Granting Leave to Amend by 6/22/20 by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. The Clerk is directed to mail a Form Section 2255 Motion to Mr. Verdream with instructions. (ag)
May 19, 2020 United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza assigned. (dr)
May 14, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255, filed by James Verdream. (meq)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Verdream v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Verdream
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?