Leyba v. Social Security Administration
| 1:2020cv00555 |
| October 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Albuquerque Office |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa granting 35 Plaintiff's Opposed Motion for Attorney's Fees Pursuant to 42 USC 406(b) (am)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER TO SUPPLEMENT by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. Plaintiff's counsel is ordered to supplement his briefing related to his fee request under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), no later than September 13, 2023, to provide any fee agreement(s) governin g work he performed on Plaintiff's behalf in this Court in 2017 and 2018 and to disclose the amount of fees he recovered for work performed before the SSA. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (am)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa granting Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and/or Remand (Doc. 23). (kmt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Leyba v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
