Tafoya v. Social Security Administration
| Cheryl Tafoya |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2020cv00588 |
| June 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Karen B Molzen |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Social Security Administration voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Lucero, Manuel)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Manuel Lucero on behalf of Social Security Administration (Lucero, Manuel) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed U. S. Attorney served on 7/7/2020, answer due 9/8/2020. (ln) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed U.S. Attorney General served on 7/6/2020, answer due 9/4/2020. (ln) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Social Security Administration served on 7/6/2020, answer due 9/4/2020. (ln) |
| Filing 5 FILED IN ERROR - SUMMONS Returned Executed Social Security Administration served on 7/6/2020, answer due 9/4/2020. (ln) Modified docket text, incorrect document attached on 7/10/2020 (ln). |
| Filing 4 Letter to the USMS re service on defendant Social Security Administration was hand-delivered 06/22/20. (ln) |
| Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dr) |
Filing 3
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen granting #2 Motion to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is authorized to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee, costs, or security therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the Summons and Complaint on the United States Attorney, the Attorney General, and the Office of the General Counsel, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). (KBM)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
| United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen assigned. (ln) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Cheryl Tafoya. (ln) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, filed by Cheryl Tafoya. (ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tafoya v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cheryl Tafoya | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Manuel Lucero |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
