Schauff et al v. Tripathi et al
Joseph Schauff and Peggy Schauff |
Lloyd Glick and Sushama Tripathi |
1:2020cv00590 |
June 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Jerry H Ritter |
John F Robbenhaar |
Securities/Commodities |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Joseph Schauff, Peggy Schauff voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Saucedo, Christopher)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that the Clerk will reassign this matter to a district judge as the trial judge no later than 7 days from the entry of this notice unless consents from all parties have been filed. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (dr)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 5 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Joseph Schauff, Peggy Schauff. (Saucedo, Christopher) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by Lloyd Glick. (arp) |
Summons Issued as to Lloyd Glick, Sushama Tripathi on Amended Complaint. (dr) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT, THE NEW MEXICO UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT, AND OTHER WRONGS against All Defendants., filed by Joseph Schauff, Peggy Schauff. (Saucedo, Christopher) |
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (arp) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE UNFAIR PRACTICES ACT, BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY, WRONGFUL MISREPRESENTATION, AND OTHER WRONGS against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by JOSEPH SCHAUFF, PEGGY SCHAUFF. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Saucedo, Christopher) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number ANMDC-7174613 re #1 Complaint, filed by JOSEPH SCHAUFF, PEGGY SCHAUFF (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Saucedo, Christopher) |
United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar and United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (arp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.