Hart v. Gallegos
| Myrtis Paulo Hart |
| Mark Gallegos and Curry County Adult Detention Center |
| 1:2020cv00595 |
| June 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| William P Johnson |
| Stephan M Vidmar |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. Plaintiff's Show-Cause Response is due by August 21, 2020. (jcm)
|
|
Filing 7
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. Mail sent to Myrtis Paulo Hart (meq)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Myrtis Paulo Hart. (meq)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Myrtis Paulo Hart. (meq)
|
|
Filing 4
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, adding Curry County Adult Detention Center, filed by Myrtis Paulo Hart. (meq)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Myrtis Paulo Hart. (meq)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER to Cure Defects by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. Plaintiff must cure defects no later than July 22, 2020. (jcm)
|
|
Filing 1
1983 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Defendant, filed by Myrtis Paulo Hart. (ln)
|
|
United States Chief District Judge William P. Johnson and United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar assigned. (ln)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
