Parts Plus of New Mexico, Inc. et al v. Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota
Plaintiff: Samuel E. Honegger, LLC and Parts Plus of New Mexico, Inc.
Defendant: Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota
Case Number: 1:2020cv00675
Filed: July 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Stephan M Vidmar
Referring Judge: Steven C Yarbrough
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING as moot #5 Defendant's Motion to Partially Dismiss Plaintiffs' Claims. Because Plaintiffs have filed #11 an Amended Complaint, Defendant confirms that the Motion is moot and no longer requires a ruling. See #16 Defendant's Status Report. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. NO DOCUMENTS ARE ATTACHED.] (am)
September 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 STATUS REPORT by Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota (Wilson, Lisa)
August 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan by Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota (Wilson, Lisa)
August 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DIRECTING Defendant to file a status report no later than September 3, 2020. (rcf)
August 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ANSWER to #11 Amended Complaint by Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota.(Wilson, Lisa)
July 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Partially Plaintiffs' Claims filed by Parts Plus of New Mexico, Inc., Samuel E. Honegger, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Jones, William)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota., filed by Parts Plus of New Mexico, Inc., Samuel E. Honegger, LLC. (Jones, William)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 9 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge filed by Parts Plus of New Mexico, Inc. and Samuel E. Honegger, LLC & 8 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge filed by Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (rh)
July 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Parts Plus of New Mexico, Inc. and Samuel E. Honegger, LLC voluntarily consent to have United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Jones, William)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] Modified on 7/22/2020 (rh).
July 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Wilson, Lisa)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
July 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 09/08/2020 at 10:30 AM. Joint Status Report due by 08/28/2020. (cm)
July 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that this matter will be reassigned to a district judge as presiding judge if written consents from all parties have not been filed within10 days. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (rh)
July 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Partially Plaintiffs' Claims by Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota. (Wilson, Lisa)
July 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE by Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota re #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Defendant's Notice of Removal to Federal Court) (Wilson, Lisa)
July 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
July 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota identifying Corporate Parent W.R. Berkley Corporation for Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota. (Wilson, Lisa)
July 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Second Judicial District Court County of Bernalillo, case number D-202-CV-2020-03167. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index of Documents, #2 Exhibit Register of Actions, #3 Exhibit Complaint, #4 Exhibit Plaintiff's Certification Regarding Arbitration, #5 Exhibit Jury Demand, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Wilson, Lisa)
July 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number ANMDC-7202722 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Wilson, Lisa)
July 9, 2020 Opinion or Order United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar and United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (dr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parts Plus of New Mexico, Inc. et al v. Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota
Represented By: Lisa M. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samuel E. Honegger, LLC
Represented By: Brian K. Branch
Represented By: William T Jones
Represented By: William Truman Jones, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Parts Plus of New Mexico, Inc.
Represented By: Brian K. Branch
Represented By: William T Jones
Represented By: William Truman Jones, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?