Rosales v. Bradshaw et al
Mario Rosales |
David Bradshaw and Britt Snyder |
Board of County Commissioners of Chaves County |
1:2020cv00751 |
July 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
James O Browning |
Jerry H Ritter |
Steven C Yarbrough |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 NOTICE of Hearing on Motion #20 MOTION to Dismiss on the Basis of Qualified Immunity : Motion Hearing set for 9/23/2020 at 02:30 PM in Albuquerque - 460 Vermejo Courtroom - Remote before District Judge James O. Browning. (cjw)NOTE:1. This proceeding will be held via Zoom Video/Web Conferencing with all participants appearing remotely; the Zoom ID and Passcode will be provided separately to the participants email address of record.2. Participants should connect to the proceeding 15 minutes prior its scheduled start time to allow time for trouble-shooting of any connectivity issues.3. To ensure the record is of the best quality participants are encouraged to utilize a headset to reduce static and background noise; if not using a headset participants must ensure the audio feed at their location is muted when not speaking.*** REMINDER: Recording or broadcasting of this hearing is prohibited. ***[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 30 NOTICE of Briefing Complete by David Bradshaw re #20 MOTION to Dismiss on the Basis of Qualified Immunity filed by David Bradshaw (Macke, Daniel) |
Filing 29 REPLY to Response to Motion re #20 MOTION to Dismiss on the Basis of Qualified Immunity filed by David Bradshaw. (Macke, Daniel) |
Filing 28 Intervenor COMPLAINT , filed by Board of County Commissioners of Chaves County. (Dickman, Michael) |
Filing 27 Clerk's Minutes for proceedings held before District Judge James O. Browning: Motion Hearing held on 9/14/2020 re #11 Opposed MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for qualified immunity filed by Britt Snyder. (Court Reporter J. Bean) (cmm) |
Filing 26 RESPONSE in Opposition re #21 MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Britt Snyder's Motion to Dismiss, #11 Opposed MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for qualified immunity and Defendant's Contingent Reply In Support of his MTD filed by Britt Snyder. (Drebing, Mark) |
Filing 25 RESPONSE in Opposition re #20 MOTION to Dismiss on the Basis of Qualified Immunity filed by Mario Rosales. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Newell, Michael) |
Filing 24 Clerk's Minutes for proceedings held before District Judge James O. Browning: Motion Hearing held on 9/8/2020 re #5 Opposed MOTION to Intervene filed by Board of County Commissioners of Chaves County. (Court Reporter J. Bean) (meq) |
Filing 23 NOTICE of Hearing on Motion #5 Opposed MOTION to Intervene : Motion Hearing set for 9/8/2020 at 08:30 AM in Albuquerque - 460 Vermejo Courtroom - Remote before District Judge James O. Browning. (cjw)NOTE:1. This proceeding will be held via Zoom Video/Web Conferencing with all participants appearing remotely; the Zoom ID and Passcode will be provided separately to the participants email address of record.2. Participants should connect to the proceeding 15 minutes prior its scheduled start time to allow time for trouble-shooting of any connectivity issues.3. To ensure the record is of the best quality participants are encouraged to utilize a headset to reduce static and background noise; if not using a headset participants must ensure the audio feed at their location is muted when not speaking.*** REMINDER: Recording or broadcasting of this hearing is prohibited. ***[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Hearing on Motion #11 Opposed MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for qualified immunity : Motion Hearing set for 9/15/2020 at 08:30 AM in Albuquerque - 460 Vermejo Courtroom - Remote before District Judge James O. Browning. (cjw)NOTE:1. This proceeding will be held via Zoom Video/Web Conferencing with all participants appearing remotely; the Zoom ID and Passcode will be provided separately to the participants email address of record.2. Participants should connect to the proceeding 15 minutes prior its scheduled start time to allow time for trouble-shooting of any connectivity issues.3. To ensure the record is of the best quality participants are encouraged to utilize a headset to reduce static and background noise; if not using a headset participants must ensure the audio feed at their location is muted when not speaking.*** REMINDER: Recording or broadcasting of this hearing is prohibited. ***[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 21 MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Britt Snyder's Motion to Dismiss by Mario Rosales. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Newell, Michael) |
Filing 20 MOTION to Dismiss on the Basis of Qualified Immunity by David Bradshaw. (Macke, Daniel) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Briefing Complete by Board of County Commissioners of Chaves County re #5 Opposed MOTION to Intervene filed by Board of County Commissioners of Chaves County (Dickman, Michael) |
Filing 18 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 Opposed MOTION to Intervene filed by Board of County Commissioners of Chaves County. (Dickman, Michael) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Briefing Complete by Britt Snyder re #11 Opposed MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for qualified immunity filed by Britt Snyder (Drebing, Mark) |
Filing 16 NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: Nos. 3 and 9. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bl) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 Opposed MOTION to Intervene filed by David Bradshaw. (Macke, Daniel) |
Filing 14 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to District Judge James O. Browning as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
Filing 13 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter finding good cause, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 (b)(2), to delay entering a Scheduling Order at this time due to the pending dispositive motions. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 12 Transmittal of State Court Documents by Britt Snyder (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Drebing, Mark) |
Filing 11 Opposed MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for qualified immunity by Britt Snyder. (Huss, Brandon) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by David Bradshaw. (Macke, Daniel) |
Filing 8 NOTICE by David Bradshaw Notice of Consent to Removal (Macke, Daniel) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel J Macke on behalf of David Bradshaw (Macke, Daniel) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that the Clerk will reassign this matter to a district judge as the trial judge no later than 10 days from the entry of this notice unless consents from all parties have been filed. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (cm)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 5 Opposed MOTION to Intervene by Board of County Commissioners of Chaves County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit (Proposed Complaint-in-Intervention)) (Dickman, Michael) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Dickman on behalf of Board of County Commissioners of Chaves County (Dickman, Michael) |
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (arp) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Britt Snyder from Fifth Judicial District Court, case number D-504-CV-2020-310. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Britt Snyder. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Roman, David) |
United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough and United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (arp) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number ANMDC-7225907 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Britt Snyder (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Roman, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.