Chavez v. New Mexico Corrections Department et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Chavez
Defendant: New Mexico Corrections Department, Estevan Flores, John Doe 3, John Doe 2, Abel Renteria, John Doe 1 and John Does
Case Number: 1:2020cv00812
Filed: August 12, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Kea W Riggs
Referring Judge: Stephan M Vidmar
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: No. 10. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bl)
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Christopher Chavez Plaintiff's First Set of Discovery to New Mexico Corrections Department (Linnenburger, Paul)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to District Judge Kea W. Riggs as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
September 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. Joint Status Report is due by October 14, 2020. A telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for November 5, 2020 at 3:30 p.m. MST. Counsel must call Judge Vidmar's AT&T Conference Line at (888) 363-4734 (access code: 4382538) to connect to the proceedings. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 9/23/2020. (rcf)
September 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Clerk's Minutes for telephonic status conference held before Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar on September 1, 2020. (Recording Info: MARS) (rcf)
August 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar SETTING telephonic Status Conference for September 1, 2020, at 1:30 p.m. Counsel must call Judge Vidmar's AT&T Conference Line at (888) 363-4734 (access code: 4382538) to connect to the proceedings. (jcm)
August 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Transmittal of State Court Documents by Estevan Flores, New Mexico Corrections Department, Abel Renteria (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Moulton, Debra)
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number ALB047519 (ln)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Estevan Flores, New Mexico Corrections Department, Abel Renteria. (Moulton, Debra)
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Estevan Flores, New Mexico Corrections Department, Abel Renteria (Moulton, Debra)
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 6 (Santa Fe) to 1 (Albuquerque). (dr)
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa and United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar assigned. (dr)
August 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Estevan Flores, Abel Renteria, New Mexico Corrections Department from First Judicial District Court, case number D-101-CV-2020-01064. ( Filing Fee - Deliver Payment), filed by Estevan Flores, Abel Renteria, New Mexico Corrections Department. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(Moulton, Debra)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chavez v. New Mexico Corrections Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New Mexico Corrections Department
Represented By: Debra J. Moulton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Estevan Flores
Represented By: Debra J. Moulton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe 3
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe 2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Abel Renteria
Represented By: Debra J. Moulton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Chavez
Represented By: Kate S Thompson
Represented By: Maggie H Lane
Represented By: Paul M Linnenburger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?