Gatlin v. New Mexico Department of Corrections et al
Jason T. Gatlin |
New Mexico Department of Corrections and Core Civic Inc. |
1:2020cv00865 |
August 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Laura Fashing |
Judith C Herrera |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing granting #2 Motion to Screen Complaint and Stay Proceedings. (cda) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Stay Re: Motion to Screen Complaint and Stay Proceedings by CoreCivic, Inc.. (Hanna, Katherine) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CoreCivic, Inc. from Second Judicial District Court - Bernalillo, case number D-202-CV-202002218. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by CoreCivic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - State Court Filings (as of 8/27/2020), #3 Exhibit 3 - State Court Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Attachment to Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Hanna, Katherine) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number ANMDC-7279477 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by CoreCivic, Inc. (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Hanna, Katherine) |
United States District Judge Judith C. Herrera and United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (arp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.