Esquibel v. City of Las Vegas et al
| Mark Anthony Esquibel and Mark Esquibel |
| Diego Romero, City of Las Vegas, Jason Gage, Eric Padilla, Gerald Lozano, Mike Ortega, Pam Sandoval and Chris Lopez |
| 1:2020cv00960 |
| September 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| James O Browning |
| Laura Fashing |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Defendants ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by City of Las Vegas, Jason Gage, Chris Lopez, Gerald Lozano, Mike Ortega, Eric Padilla, Diego Romero, Pam Sandoval. (Attachments: #1 Second Amended Complaint) (Baker, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: No. 7. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (kg) |
Filing 10
ORDER TO VACATE INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. The Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference set for 11/17/2020 at 02:15 PM in Albuquerque is VACATED. Judge Browning will set an Initial Scheduling Conference at a later date. [THIIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. NO DOCUMENTS ARE ATTACHED.] (cda)
|
| Filing 9 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to United States District Judge James O. Browning as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (arp) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Mark Esquibel Withdrawal of Counsel - Erin L. Chavez (Chavez, Erin) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that this matter will be reassigned to a district judge as presiding judge if written consents from all parties have not been filed by October 14, 2020. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (rh) |
|
Filing 5
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference set for 11/17/2020 at 02:15 PM in Albuquerque - Telephonic Hearing/Conference before Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan due by 11/10/2020. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 10/14/2020. (cda)
|
| Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number ALB047806 (ln)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 3 APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT re #1 Notice of Removal,,,,, Civil Cover Sheet by City of Las Vegas, Jason Gage, Chris Lopez, Gerald Lozano, Mike Ortega, Eric Padilla, Diego Romero, Pam Sandoval (Baker, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar and United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (dr) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Mike Ortega, Chris Lopez, Jason Gage, Diego Romero, City of Las Vegas, New Mexico, Gerald Lozano, Padilla Eric, Pam Sandoval from Fourth Judicial District Court, case number D-412-Cv-2019-00093. ( Filing Fee - Deliver Payment), filed by Mike Ortega, Chris Lopez, Jason Gage, Diego Romero, City of Las Vegas, New Mexico, Gerald Lozano, Padilla Eric, Pam Sandoval. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit, #16 Exhibit, #17 Exhibit, #18 Exhibit, #19 Exhibit, #20 Exhibit, #21 Exhibit, #22 Exhibit, #23 Exhibit, #24 Exhibit, #25 Exhibit, #26 Exhibit, #27 Exhibit, #28 Exhibit, #29 Exhibit, #30 Exhibit, #31 Exhibit, #32 Exhibit, #33 Exhibit, #34 Exhibit, #35 Exhibit, #36 Exhibit, #37 Exhibit, #38 Exhibit, #39 Exhibit, #40 Exhibit, #41 Exhibit, #42 Exhibit, #43 Exhibit, #44 Exhibit, #45 Exhibit, #46 Exhibit, #47 Exhibit, #48 Exhibit, #49 Exhibit, #50 Exhibit Second Amended Complaint)(Baker, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
