Naranjo v. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: John Naranjo
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2020cv01082
Filed: October 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Steven C Yarbrough
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Naranjo. Social Security Administration served on 11/10/2020, answer due 1/15/2021. (Martone, Feliz)
November 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Naranjo. U.S. Attorney's Office served on 11/6/2020, answer due 1/15/2021. (Martone, Feliz) Modified on 11/25/2020 (arp).
November 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Naranjo. U.S. Attorney General served on 11/16/2020, answer due 1/15/2021. (Martone, Feliz) Modified on 11/25/2020 (arp).
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Marc Thayne Warner on behalf of Social Security Administration (Warner, Marc)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 **FILED IN ERROR**SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Naranjo. Social Security Administration served on 11/10/2020, answer due 1/15/2021. (Martone, Feliz) Modified on 11/19/2020 (dr).
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 **FILED IN ERROR**SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Naranjo. Social Security Administration served on 11/6/2020, answer due 1/15/2021. (Martone, Feliz) Modified on 11/19/2020 (dr).
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 **FILED IN ERROR**SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Naranjo. Social Security Administration served on 11/16/2020, answer due 1/15/2021. (Martone, Feliz) Modified on 11/19/2020 (dr).
November 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 5 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Social Security Administration, 3 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by John Naranjo. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
November 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Social Security Administration voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Lucero, Manuel)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
November 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Manuel Lucero on behalf of Social Security Administration (Lucero, Manuel)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), John Naranjo voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Martone, Feliz)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dr)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by John Naranjo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martone, Feliz)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number ANMDC-7364781 re #1 Complaint filed by John Naranjo (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Martone, Feliz)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (dr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Naranjo v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Naranjo
Represented By: Feliz MariSol Martone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Manuel Lucero
Represented By: Marc Thayne Warner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?