Security USA Services, LLC v. Invariant Corp. et al
Security USA Services, LLC |
Hyperion Technology Group, Inc. and Invariant Corp. |
1:2020cv01100 |
October 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Kea W Riggs |
Kevin R Sweazea |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 DECLARATION re #17 Response in Opposition to Motion of David Anderson by Hyperion Technology Group, Inc., Invariant Corp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Allison, Benjamin) |
Filing 18 DECLARATION re #17 Response in Opposition to Motion of Geoffrey Carter by Hyperion Technology Group, Inc., Invariant Corp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9) (Allison, Benjamin) |
Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Hyperion Technology Group, Inc., Invariant Corp.. (Allison, Benjamin) |
Filing 16 AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint and, COUNTERCLAIM against Security USA Services, LLC by Hyperion Technology Group, Inc., Invariant Corp.. Related document: #4 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal), Counterclaim filed by Hyperion Technology Group, Inc., Invariant Corp..(Allison, Benjamin) |
Filing 15 AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Security USA Services, LLC by Hyperion Technology Group, Inc., Invariant Corp.. Related document: #4 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal), Counterclaim filed by Hyperion Technology Group, Inc., Invariant Corp..(Miller, Justin) |
Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Hyperion Technology Group, Inc. (Allison, Benjamin) |
Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Invariant Corp. (Allison, Benjamin) |
Filing 12 NOTICE by Hyperion Technology Group, Inc., Invariant Corp. re #9 MOTION to Strike #4 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal), Counterclaim , #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction , #8 Memorandum in Support, #10 MOTION to Strike #4 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal), Counterclaim of Stipulated Extension of Time to Respond (Allison, Benjamin) |
Filing 11 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to United States District Judge Kea W. Riggs as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Strike #4 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal), Counterclaim by Security USA Services, LLC. (Rodriguez, Augustine) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Strike #4 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal), Counterclaim by Security USA Services, LLC. (Rodriguez, Augustine) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Security USA Services, LLC. (Rodriguez, Augustine) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Security USA Services, LLC. (Rodriguez, Augustine) |
Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Hyperion Technology Group, Inc., Invariant Corp. (Allison, Benjamin) |
Filing 5 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. Telephonic Rule 16(c) Hearing set for January 11, 2021 at 10:00 AM. Joint Status Report due by January 4, 2021. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than November 25, 2020. (atc) |
Filing 4 DEFENDANTS' ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) , COUNTERCLAIM against Security USA Services, LLC by Hyperion Technology Group, Inc., Invariant Corp.. (Allison, Benjamin) |
Filing 3 Report re:trademark (dr) |
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough and United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea assigned. (dr) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Hyperion Technology Group, Inc., Invariant Corp. from Second Judicial District Court of New Mexico, case number D-202-CV-2020-05310. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Hyperion Technology Group, Inc., Invariant Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Allison, Benjamin) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number ANMDC-7377138 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Hyperion Technology Group, Inc., Invariant Corp. (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Allison, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.