Henderson v. Rourke et al
Andrew Henderson |
Schneider National Trucking, Inc. and Mark Rourke |
1:2020cv01139 |
November 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Jerry H Ritter |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 AMENDED MOTION to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Andrew Henderson. (ln) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Schneider National Trucking, Inc.. terminating Mark Rourke., filed by Andrew Henderson. (Attachments: #1 attachment, #2 attachment, #3 attachment, #4 attachment, #5 attachment, #6 attachment, #7 attachment)(ln) |
Filing 5 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter granting #2 Motion to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915. Plaintiff may, within 21 days of entry of this Order, file an amended complaint. (cd) |
Filing 4 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter has been assigned for a 28 U.S.C. 1915 review. (ln)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 3 CM/ECF Pro Se Notification Form by Andrew Henderson electing to receive notification via e-mail. (ln) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Andrew Henderson. (ln) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Andrew Henderson. (ln) |
United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.