Gardner v. Delta Dental Plan of New Mexico, Inc. et al
William Gardner |
Jason Louis Snider, Delta Dental Plan of New Mexico, Inc., Delta Dental Plan of Michigan, Inc., Edward J. Lopez and Jesus Carlos Galvan |
1:2020cv01271 |
December 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Laura Fashing |
Martha Vazquez |
Gregory B Wormuth |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. § 1962 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 Second MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by William Gardner. (Laux, Joseph) |
Filing 30 ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez DENYING #29 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. The Motion is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 7.1: Movant must determine whether a motion is opposed, and a motion that omits recitation of a good-faith request for concurrence may be summarily denied. (laz)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 29 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by William Gardner. (Laux, Joseph) |
Filing 28 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants., filed by William Gardner. (Laux, Joseph) |
Filing 27 ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez GRANTING #26 ORDER on Motion to Withdraw Motion. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (gr) |
Filing 26 First MOTION to Withdraw Motion for TRO, Preliminary Injunction, and Permanent Injunctive Relief by William Gardner. (Laux, Joseph) |
Filing 25 STIPULATED ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez GRANTING #18 Motion for More Definite Statement. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall file with the Court a first amended complaint that fully complies with Rules 10(b) and 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than ten (10) days from the date of entry of this Order. 2. Defendants shall file their responses within 14 days of service of the amended complaint. (gr) |
Filing 24 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark A. Glenn on behalf of Delta Dental Plan of Michigan, Inc. (Glenn, Mark) |
Filing 23 ORDER for Expedited Briefing Schedule re #12 First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order on Delta Dental of New Mexico filed by William Gardner by District Judge Martha Vazquez. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. If Defendants oppose Plaintiff's Motion, a written response shall be filed with the Court and served on Plaintiff no later than January 20, 2021. 2. Plaintiff's reply, if any, shall be filed with the Court and served on Defendants no later than February 3, 2021. 3. The Court will set a hearing on this matter if it finds that such a hearing is necessary. (gr) |
Filing 22 REPLY to Response to Motion re #18 Joint MOTION for More Definite Statement by All Defendants filed by William Gardner. (Laux, Joseph) |
Filing 21 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to District Judge Martha Vazquez as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Suzanne C Odom on behalf of Delta Dental Plan of New Mexico, Inc., Jesus Carlos Galvan (Odom, Suzanne) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Jesse D. Hale on behalf of Edward J. Lopez (Hale, Jesse) |
Filing 18 Joint MOTION for More Definite Statement by All Defendants by Delta Dental Plan of Michigan, Inc.. (Meagle, Shay) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Shay Elizabeth Meagle on behalf of Jason Louis Snider (Meagle, Shay) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Shay Elizabeth Meagle on behalf of Delta Dental Plan of Michigan, Inc. (Meagle, Shay) |
Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Affidavit of Service for TRO served on Delta Dental Plan of NM on 12/30/2020, filed by William Gardner. (Laux, Joseph) |
Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Affidavit of Service for TRO served on Delta Dental Plan of MI on 12/30/2020, filed by William Gardner. (Laux, Joseph) |
Filing 13 APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT TRO Cover Sheet by William Gardner (Laux, Joseph) |
Filing 12 ***WITHDRAWN pursuant to 27 ORDER*** First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order on Delta Dental of New Mexico by William Gardner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to TRO) (Laux, Joseph) Modified text on 1/19/2021 add withdrawn language (gr). |
Filing 11 Affidavit of Service by William Gardner. Jesus Carlos Galvan served on 12/20/2020, answer due 1/11/2021. (Laux, Joseph) Modified text on 12/24/2020 (vh). |
Filing 10 Affidavit of Service by William Gardner. Delta Dental of New Mexico in Bernalillo County served on 12/18/2020, answer due 1/8/2021. (Laux, Joseph) Modified text on 12/21/2020 (vh). |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by William Gardner. Jason Louis Snider served on 12/15/2020, answer due 1/5/2021. (Laux, Joseph) Modified text on 12/21/2020 (vh). |
Filing 8 Affidavit of Service by William Gardner. Edward Lopez, Jr. served on 12/14/2020, answer due 1/4/2021. (Laux, Joseph) Modified text on 12/21/2020 (vh). |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by William Gardner. Delta Dental Plan of Michigan, Inc. served on 12/14/2020, answer due 1/4/2021. (Laux, Joseph) Modified text on 12/21/2020 (vh). |
Filing 6 ORDER TO QUASH #4 Order to Show Cause by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Plaintiff has fulfilled the requirements in the Order to Show Cause to the Courts satisfaction and no sanctions will be imposed at this time. The Clerk is directed to unseal #1 the Complaint filed by William Gardner. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. NO DOCUMENTS ARE ATTACHED.] (cda) |
Filing 5 Plaintiff's RESPONSE re #4 Order to Show Cause filed by William Gardner. (Laux, Joseph) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Show Cause Response due by 12/28/2020. (cda) |
Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (dr) |
Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Patrick Laux on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Laux, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by William Gardner. (Laux, Joseph) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-7442127 re #1 Complaint filed by William Gardner (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Laux, Joseph) |
United States Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth and United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (dr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.