Guangzhou Huadu Hengyu Furniture Material Factory et al v. Abundant Freedom et al
| Song Ke and Guangzhou Huadu Hengyu Furniture Material Factory |
| Abundant Freedom and Matthew Archie |
| 1:2021cv00109 |
| February 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Laura Fashing |
| Steven C Yarbrough |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Regarding Defendants Abundant Freedom and Matthew Archie's Deadline to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint by Abundant Freedom, Matthew Archie (Shaheen, Sharon) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Sharon Theresa Shaheen on behalf of All Defendants (Shaheen, Sharon) |
| Filing 7 ASSOCIATION of Attorney Licensed Outside the District for Plaintiffs Guangzhou Huadu Hengyu Furniture Material Factory, Song Ke by Alberto Leon on behalf of: Mark J. Rosenberg Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP 1350 BroadwayNew York, New York 10018 (212) 216-1127 mrosenberg@tarterkrinsky.com (Association Dues - Online Payment) (Leon, Alberto)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Guangzhou Huadu Hengyu Furniture Material Factory, Song Ke Notice of Good Standing of Attorney Mark J Rosenberg (Leon, Alberto) |
| Association Dues Received: $ 100 receipt number ANMDC-7550465 re: # 7 Association of Attorney Licensed Outside the District, filed by Song Ke, Guangzhou Huadu Hengyu Furniture Material Factory (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Leon, Alberto) |
| Filing 5 Report re: patent with complaint and exhibits mailed to Mail Stop 8, Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. (arp) |
| Filing 4 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (arp) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number ANMDC-7539780 (arp)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 2 APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT Civil Cover Sheet by Guangzhou Huadu Hengyu Furniture Material Factory, Song Ke (Leon, Alberto) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment and Damages against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by GUANGZHOU HUADU HENGYU FURNITURE MATERIAL FACTORY, SONG KE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Patent Letters, #2 Exhibit Amazon Product Listing, #3 Exhibit Catalog Pages, #4 Exhibit Website Product Display)(Leon, Alberto) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing and United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (arp) |
| Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (arp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
