Doe v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
| Jane Doe |
| UNUM Life Insurance Company of America |
| 1:2021cv00115 |
| February 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Laura Fashing |
| Steven C Yarbrough |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Summons Issued as to UNUM Life Insurance Company of America. (jg) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Jane Doe Certification of Good Standing of Attorneys Licensed Outside the District (Danoff, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (arp) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough and United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (arp) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Jane Doe re #1 Complaint Civil Cover Sheet (Danoff, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 ASSOCIATION of Attorney Licensed Outside the District for Plaintiff Jane Doe by Ryan Danoff on behalf of: Andrew S. Davis LAMBERT COFFIN One Canal Plaza, Suite 400Portland, Maine 04101 207-370-3010 adavis@lambertcoffin.com (Association Dues - Online Payment) (Danoff, Ryan)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNUM Life Insurance Company of America ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Jane Doe. (Danoff, Ryan) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-7542600 re #1 Complaint filed by Jane Doe (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Danoff, Ryan) |
| Association Dues Received: $ 100 receipt number ANMDC-7542587 re: # 2 Association of Attorney Licensed Outside the District, filed by Jane Doe (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Danoff, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Doe v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNUM Life Insurance Company of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jane Doe | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Danoff |
| Represented By: | Andrew S. Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
