Hamilton v. Thompson et al
Latanya Hamilton |
Raymond William Thompson and Decker Truck Line, Inc. |
1:2021cv00169 |
February 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Kirtan Khalsa |
Jerry H Ritter |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Decker Truck Line, Inc. First Interrogatories and Requests for Production to Plaintiff (Richards, Lance) |
Filing 11 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter setting a Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference for 5/10/2021 at 02:00 PM in Albuquerque - Telephonic Hearing/Conference before Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter. Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan due by 5/3/2021. (cd) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 9 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Decker Truck Line, Inc., Raymond William Thompson, 8 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Latanya Hamilton. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Decker Truck Line, Inc., Raymond William Thompson voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Richards, Lance)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 8 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Latanya Hamilton voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Campbell, Una)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 7 NOTICE by Raymond William Thompson Acceptance of Service on behalf of Raymond William Thompson (Richards, Lance) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Decker Truck Line, Inc., Raymond William Thompson identifying Corporate Parent Decker Truck Line, Inc. for Decker Truck Line, Inc.. (Richards, Lance) |
Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Decker Truck Line, Inc., Raymond William Thompson (Richards, Lance) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Lance Dean Richards on behalf of Decker Truck Line, Inc., Raymond William Thompson (Richards, Lance) |
Filing 3 Raymond William Thompson and Decker Truck Line, Inc. ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Decker Truck Line, Inc., Raymond William Thompson. (Richards, Lance) |
Filing 2 APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT re #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover sheet by Decker Truck Line, Inc., Raymond William Thompson (Richards, Lance) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Decker Truck Line, Inc., Raymond William Thompson from Seventh Judicial District Court, Torrance County, case number D722cv202100011. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Decker Truck Line, Inc., Raymond William Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Richards, Lance) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-7561977 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Decker Truck Line, Inc., Raymond William Thompson (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Richards, Lance) |
United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa and United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (dr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.