Herrera v. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Joseph Patrick Herrera
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2021cv00227
Filed: March 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Karen B Molzen
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 4 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Joseph Patrick Herrera, 10 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Social Security Administration. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Social Security Administration voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Lucero, Manuel)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Manuel Lucero on behalf of Social Security Administration (Lucero, Manuel)
April 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed Attorney General served on 4/2/2021, answer due 6/1/2021 Amended Summons to be Issued as to U.S. Attorney General to correct civil action no.(jg)
April 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Social Security Administration served on 4/2/2021, answer due 6/1/2021Amended Summons to be Issued as to Social Security Administration to correct civil action no. (jg)
April 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed U.S. Attorney served on 4/2/2021, answer due 6/1/2021. Amended Summons to be Issued as to U.S. Attorney to correct civil action no. (jg)
April 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Summons Reissued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (jg)
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dr)
March 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is authorized to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee, costs, or security therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the Summons and Complaint on the United States Attorney, the Attorney General, and the Office of the General Counsel, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). (KBM)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Joseph Patrick Herrera voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (MacDowell, Francesca)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg)
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joseph Patrick Herrera. (MacDowell, Francesca)
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration ( Filing Fee - Waived), filed by Joseph Patrick Herrera. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MacDowell, Francesca)
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen assigned. (jg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Herrera v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Patrick Herrera
Represented By: Francesca J. MacDowell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Manuel Lucero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?