Mortensen v. United States of America et al
| Tucker Mortensen |
| Eugene Martinez, The Rio Rancho Police Department, The City of Rio Rancho, Estate of Donald Daniel Erick, John Roskos and United States of America |
| 1:2021cv00459 |
| May 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| James O Browning |
| Laura Fashing |
| Gregory B Wormuth |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: No. 5. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bl) |
| Filing 11 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to United States District Judge James O. Browning as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (arp) |
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice by Estate of Donald Daniel Erick. (Schwarz, Todd) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal as to United States of America by Tucker Mortensen (Hinkle, Cloyd) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Estate of Donald Daniel Erick Entry of Appearance (Schwarz, Todd) |
Filing 7
ORDER OF SUBSTITUTION OF PARTY by Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth. (ceo)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Eugene Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Currie, Cassandra) |
| Filing 4 APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT re #3 Notice (Other) Certification by U.S. Attorney by Eugene Martinez (Currie, Cassandra) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Eugene Martinez Notice of Substitution of Party (Currie, Cassandra) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Eugene Martinez from New Mexico Second Judicial District Court, case number D-202-CV-202002617. ( Filing Fee - Waived), filed by Eugene Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(Currie, Cassandra) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing and United States Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth assigned. (jg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
