Clark et al v. Bradford et al
| Ingrid C Clark and Terry Wayne Anderson |
| CRST Expedited, Inc. and Fredrick E Bradford |
| 1:2021cv00577 |
| June 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Laura Fashing |
| Judith C Herrera |
| Jerry H Ritter |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Fredrick E Bradford, CRST Expedited, Inc. CRST Expedited's First Interrogatories and First Requests for Production to Plaintiff Terry Anderson and Plaintiff Ingrid Clark (Richards, Lance) |
Filing 19
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Settlement Conference set for 2/9/2022 at 09:00 AM remote via Zoom before Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. (cda)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER ADOPTING JOINT STATUS REPORT AND PROVISIONAL DISCOVERY PLAN and SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Discovery due by 6/1/2022. Motions due by 7/1/2022. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 8/29/2022. (cda)
|
| Filing 17 Clerk's Minutes for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing: Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference held on 8/11/2021. (cda) |
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Fredrick E Bradford, CRST Expedited, Inc. service of Initial Disclosures to Plaintiffs (Richards, Lance) |
| Filing 15 Joint Status Report Joint Status Report Clark/Anderson v. Bradford/CRST by Terry Wayne Anderson (Caruso, Mark) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: No. 10. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bl) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Fredrick E Bradford. (Richards, Lance) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Lance Dean Richards on behalf of Fredrick E Bradford (Richards, Lance) |
| Filing 11 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to United States District Judge Judith C. Herrera as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference set for 8/11/2021 at 02:15 PM in Albuquerque - Telephonic Hearing/Conference before Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan due by 8/4/2021. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 7/20/2021. (ccp)
|
| Filing 8 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
| Filing 7 APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT Civil Cover sheet by Fredrick E Bradford, CRST Expedited, Inc. (Richards, Lance) |
| Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Fredrick E Bradford, CRST Expedited, Inc. (Richards, Lance) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Fredrick E Bradford, CRST Expedited, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent CRST Expedited, Inc. for CRST Expedited, Inc., Fredrick E Bradford. (Richards, Lance) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Fredrick E Bradford, CRST Expedited, Inc. Acceptance of Service on behalf of Defendants (Richards, Lance) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Lance Dean Richards on behalf of Fredrick E Bradford, CRST Expedited, Inc. (Richards, Lance) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Fredrick E Bradford, CRST Expedited, Inc.. (Richards, Lance) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CRST Expedited, Inc., Fredrick E Bradford from first Judicial District Court, Santa Fe County, case number D101cv202100969. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by CRST Expedited, Inc., Fredrick E Bradford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Richards, Lance) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter and United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (jg) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-7756833 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Fredrick E Bradford, CRST Expedited, Inc. (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Richards, Lance) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
