Carrete v. New Mexico Racing Commission
Plaintiff: Jesus Carrete
Defendant: New Mexico Racing Commission
Case Number: 1:2021cv00678
Filed: July 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Jerry H Ritter
Referring Judge: Stephan M Vidmar
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Briefing Complete by New Mexico Racing Commission re #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by New Mexico Racing Commission (Davis, Lara)
August 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by New Mexico Racing Commission. (Davis, Lara)
August 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE by New Mexico Racing Commission of Filing of State Court Record (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Garcia, Bryan)
August 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Jesus Carrete. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Marquez, Daniel)
August 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 5 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge filed by New Mexico Racing Commission & 6 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge filed by Jesus Carrete. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (rh)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Jesus Carrete voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Marquez, Daniel)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), New Mexico Racing Commission voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Davis, Lara)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
August 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that this matter will be reassigned to a district judge as presiding judge if written consents from all parties have not been filed within 10 days. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (rh)
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by New Mexico Racing Commission. (Davis, Lara)
July 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg)
July 22, 2021 Opinion or Order United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar and United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (jg)
July 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by New Mexico Racing Commission from Second Judicial District Court, case number D-202-CV-2021-03647. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by New Mexico Racing Commission. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Summons Returns, #3 Exhibit Ex. C - Civil Cover Sheet)(Garcia, Bryan)
July 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-7798673 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by New Mexico Racing Commission (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Garcia, Bryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carrete v. New Mexico Racing Commission
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesus Carrete
Represented By: Daniel Anthony Marquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New Mexico Racing Commission
Represented By: Bryan C Garcia
Represented By: Lara White Davis
Represented By: Meghan S Nicholson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?