Granillo v. United States of America
| Anastacio Granillo |
| United States of America |
| 2:2021cv00777 |
| August 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Gregory J Fouratt |
| Stephan M Vidmar |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2674 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anastacio Granillo. Civil Process Clerk served on 8/23/2021, answer due 10/23/2021. (Martinez Sanchez, Maria) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anastacio Granillo. United States of America served on 8/25/2021, answer due 10/25/2021. (Martinez Sanchez, Maria) |
| Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (arp) |
| Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (arp) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt and United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar assigned. (arp) |
| Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (arp) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number ANMDC-7845744 re #1 COMPLAINT for Civil Rights Violations against United States of America ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Anastacio Granillo. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martinez Sanchez, Maria) filed by Anastacio Granillo. (cmm)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Civil Rights Violations against United States of America ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Anastacio Granillo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martinez Sanchez, Maria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Granillo v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anastacio Granillo | |
| Represented By: | Maria Martinez Sanchez |
| Represented By: | Rebecca Fae Sherman Sheff |
| Represented By: | Zoila Yamid Alvarez Hernandez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
