Devargas v. Gonzales et al
Eusebio Ike Devargas |
Manuel Gonzales, Bernalillo County and Bernalillo County Sheriff's Office |
1:2021cv00787 |
August 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Jerry H Ritter |
Martha Vazquez |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 FINANCIAL ENTRY by Eusebio Ike Devargas Inmate Account Summary. (gr) |
Filing 8 MOTION to enter evidence by Eusebio Ike Devargas. (gr) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Tort and Affidavit of Fact by Eusebio Ike Devargas. (gr) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Eusebio Ike Devargas. (gr) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, adding Bernalillo County Sheriff's Office, terminating Bernalillo County (New Mexico), filed by Eusebio Ike Devargas. (gr) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Tort by Eusebio Ike Devargas. (gr) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Manuel Gonzales, filed by Eusebio Ike Devargas. (gr) |
Filing 2 ORDER to Cure Deficiencies by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter. Cure Deficiencies within thirty (30) days of entry of this Order. (cd) |
Filing 1 1983 PRISONER'S CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Bernalillo County, Manuel Gonzales, filed by Eusebio Ike Devargas. (jg) |
United States District Judge Martha Vazquez and United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (jg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.