Gutierrez v. United States Attorneys Office et al
Carl Gutierrez |
United States Attorneys Office and Tom Outler |
1:2021cv00816 |
August 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Judith C Herrera |
Stephan M Vidmar |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable to Carl Gutierrez re #6 Judgment and #5 Order Dismissing Case. (mjr) |
Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT by District Judge Judith C. Herrera dismissing case without prejudice. (baw) |
Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL by District Judge Judith C. Herrera. (baw) |
Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable to Carl Gutierrez re #2 Order to Cure Defects and IFP forms. (mjr) |
Filing 3 Mail Returned as Undeliverable to Carl Gutierrez re #1 Complaint, Judge assignment. (mjr) |
Filing 2 ORDER TO CURE DEFICIENCY by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. Plaintiff must pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis no later than September 27, 2021. Plaintiff must also update his address to include his inmate number. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send copies. (rcf) |
Filing 1 1983 PRISONER'S CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Tom Outler, United States Attorneys Office, filed by Carl Gutierrez. (arp) |
United States District Judge Judith C. Herrera and United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar assigned. (arp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.